What is sdlc stand for

However, the activities do not end there. After the distribution of the software, proper maintenance has to be provided in a timely manner. This term is also known as the software development process model.

Let's look at a more intuitive way to approach the definition of the software development life cycle SDLC.

Think about the stages that software development goes through, from the very earliest fulminations of a project idea, to releasing that software live in a production environment. Here are some things that are going to be central to our explanation of the software development life cycle:. The consensus is that the SDLC as a framework developed in the s and s as computer science itself evolved quickly.

Prior to the second half of the s, when the ENIAC and various other innovations moved the computing world forward quickly, computing really wasn't elaborate enough to need something like the SDLC. Over time, the concept of structured programming brought in the need for developmental models and the SDLC was born.

Take a look at this infographic to understand this historic migration of practices from the waterfall to new DevOps and agile methodologies. Iterative and incremental practices led to prototyping in the s, which led to various different types of innovations like spiral and V-model frameworks, and then into agile in the s. There are numerous ways to describe these changes over time, but the bottom line is that the software development life cycle began as a carefully staged process.

The waterfall remains the dominant model for these early software development life cycle frameworks. In the waterfall model, everything in one stage is completed before you move to the next stage.

All planning gets completed before the project moves to implementation. All implementation is completed before the process moves to testing. Then, as these frameworks evolved into agile, this idea broke down into a system where collaborative work changed workflows, and previously monolithic staging was sliced and diced into its composite parts.

For example, testing could go on in different phases in different environments. In any case, the move from waterfall to other models, to agile and DevOps, brings us up to the current day, where the DevOps mentality is leveraging cloud architectures, micro-services and more to redefine what software development life cycle work means.

The client has a vague idea of what is required. The sales department, software engineers and domain experts all collaborate to gather information about what the product should be, its purposes and how it is supposed to work. This analysis is often coupled by market surveys. After a thorough analysis of the requirements and planning steps to reach the target, the abstract client idea is put into practice by a group of software engineers.

During this phase, the overall system architecture is designed by defining the functionality of each module as well as their interaction with third-party modules. Designers follow a set of best practices and guidelines, and use the programming tools they have at their disposal to develop the product. The code is tested to make sure it is free of bugs, adheres to the client requirements and correctly interfaces with other software products together with the underlying hardware.

The final version of the product is released to the market. Maintenance is performed over time to change the system architecture according to future needs. This may require the addition of code or alteration of the existing code. The above development process is streamlined by a series of models. The development team selects the best suitable model among several known ones. The different models are:. Developers state the requirements, analyze them, determine a solution and frame a software architecture, interface representation, and algorithmic details.

Then they develop the code, test the code, deploy the software, and maintain it. The main problem with this model is that the requirement to correct errors should be known upfront and at an early stage. Otherwise, the whole process may continue in the wrong direction, which could negatively impact the cost of production. Is a variation of the waterfall model. It emphasizes the verification and validation of the product.

All deliverables are testable and progress is tracked by milestones. Testing is implemented in parallel to the development phase. A prototype is developed in the requirement phase and evaluated by end users. Based on user feedback, developers alter the prototype to satisfy user requirements.

While this model finalizes the requirements easily, its use in the production environment might result in quality issues, thereby making the process of correction continue forever. Makes use of both waterfall and prototype models.

It adds 4th generation programming languages, rapid application development prototyping and risk analysis to the waterfall model. The system requirements are designed and a preliminary system design is created. An initial prototype is designed and tested. Based on the evaluation of test results, a second prototype is created. Subsequent prototypes are constructed to ensure customer satisfaction. The system is created based on the final prototype. The final system is evaluated and tested.

Though this model reduces risk to a large extent, it may not meet the budget and is applied differently for each application. Specifies and implements a part of the software, which is then reviewed and further requirements added and implemented in groups. Every release delivers an operational product presenting the customers with important functionalities first, lowering initial delivery costs. The risk of changing requirements is greatly reduced and customers are allowed to respond to each build.

In spite of its strengths, this model requires good planning and early definition of the complete and fully functional system. It also requires well-defined module interfaces.

Is used for time-critical applications in organizations employing disciplined methods. It speeds up the life cycle phases and has reduced scope. Is a Web application development model. Application performance monitoring APM tools can be used in a development, QA, and production environment. This keeps everyone using the same toolset across the entire development lifecycle. This SDLC model is the oldest and most straightforward.

With this methodology, we finish one phase and then start the next. The biggest drawback of this model is that small details left incomplete can hold up the entire process.

This methodology produces a succession of releases. According to Robert Half , the drawback of this model is that the heavy emphasis on customer interaction can lead the project in the wrong direction in some cases. This SDLC model emphasizes repetition. Developers create a version very quickly and for relatively little cost, then test and improve it through rapid and successive versions. One big disadvantage here is that it can eat up resources fast if left unchecked.

An extension of the waterfall model, this SDLC methodology tests at each stage of development. As with waterfall, this process can run into roadblocks. This high-risk SDLC model throws most of its resources at development and works best for small projects. It lacks the thorough requirements definition stage of the other methods.

The most flexible of the SDLC models, the spiral model is similar to the iterative model in its emphasis on repetition. The spiral model goes through the planning, design, build and test phases over and over, with gradual improvements at each pass.

SDLC done right can allow the highest level of management control and documentation. Developers understand what they should build and why. All parties agree on the goal upfront and see a clear plan for arriving at that goal. Everyone understands the costs and resources required. Several pitfalls can turn an SDLC implementation into more of a roadblock to development than a tool that helps us. Failure to take into account the needs of customers and all users and stakeholders can result in a poor understanding of the system requirements at the outset.

The benefits of SDLC only exist if the plan is followed faithfully. Want to improve application quality and monitor application performance at every stage of the SDLC? Click here to read more about the acquisition. Try Our Free Code Profiler. Try Our Code Profiler. By Role. By Technology. By Language. Documentation Support Ideas Portal Menu.

Start Free Trial. Tip: Find application errors and performance problems instantly with Stackify Retrace. Troubleshooting and optimizing your code is easy with integrated errors, logs and code level performance insights. About the Author Latest Posts. Get In Touch. Facebook Twitter Youtube Linkedin. What is APM?